ARES District 24 SET (Simulated Emergency Test) 2006

 

After–Action Report

 

 

Mission Coordinator:  Mikey Martin – KBØVJY

 

Date of Activity:  31 October 2006

 

Duration of Activity:  4 hours, 35 min.

 

Description of Activity: 

 

Each year, ARES District 24 runs a simulated emergency test (SET) to evaluate our preparedness and capabilities to respond to one of our served agencies should there be a real need.  Although the SET is simulated, it is expected that our members treat this event as if it were real.  This is a way to not only measure the district as a whole, but individually measure one’s preparedness.

 

This year’s activity took place on 31 October 2006, Halloween.  Kids were going door to door ‘trick or treating’.  Operation Great Pumpkin leveraged off these activities and made it part of the event. 

 

 

General Situation:

 

A massive ice and windstorm is moving through the area mid-afternoon on 31 October.  This has left much of the area without power and limited phone service.  The mountain-based repeaters normally used by D-24 are out of service and not expected to be back on until the weekend.

 

 

Served Agency Request:

 

Douglas County Sheriff’s Office (DCSO) has been receiving reports of roving bands of small vandals and beggars in disguises and accompanied at times by adults. They have requested D-24 members to monitor these activities in the following areas and report back to the Emergency Operations Center (EOC) which has been activated for this event:

 

Highlands Ranch

Parker

Castle Pines North

Meadows

 

 

 

Specifically, they want reports of the following:

1.       Weather conditions on a half-hourly basis

2.       Street activity

a.      Size of moving bands of suspicious persons

b.      Number of above

                  i.      Accompanied by adults

    ii.      Not accompanied by adults

c.      Traffic conditions

3.       Any signs of vandalism or crime against property

 

Built into the exercise were several non-planned events to further test the district’s abilities to perform under changing conditions.  They were:

 

1.       Wide area phone outage, both land line and cell phone

2.       Failure of the one remaining wide-area repeater

3.       Closure of I-25 as well as most roads in the county.

 

 

Description of Served Agency Participation: None

 

Number of ARES Participants:  17

 

Name and Call of Participants:

 

KØEWF         -  Eric Freund

ABØWV         -  Frank Watervoort

KAØVKM       -  Tom Lane

KCØUBD       -  Robert Wareham

WBØEVA      -  Dick bush

WØBO            -  Jim Hertzel

WØHNC         -  Andre Roy

W9BNO          -  Rick Anderson

KA9ODE        -  Garry Hefty

WB5PJB        -  Gary Sutton

WØBG            -  Mark Kelley

N2PDQ          -  Dirk Malsch

NØIVN            -  Ron Hranac      

NQØR -  Randy Reynard 

W6AUN          -  Perry Lundquist

KCØMHT       -  Dave Cook

KBØVJY         -  Mikey Martin

 

 

Person-hours of Amateur Service:       77 hours, 55 minutes + planning time that went into creating this event.

 

 

Goals of the Activity:  Determine readiness of the district, adaptability to flow with a changing situation and have fun while doing so.

 

Were the Goals Accomplished:  Yes

 

What Went Well:  As a training exercise, various members got an opportunity to practice/experience what it is like to operate as Net Control.  I was very pleased to find that proper protocol was followed.   I was extremely pleased to see that based on the weekly nets we hold, that lessons were learned and carried over into the SET.  After Net Control function was passed to a new operator, the new Net Control operator looked for and found someone to act as “back up Net Control Operator”. 

 

Proper net etiquette was followed.  I measured this by the number of ‘doubles’ that took place during the exercise.  There were very few doubles.  Members continue to use “Q” signals, an area which will be addressed through more training.

 

What Needs Improvement / Lessons Learned / Additional Training Needed:

 

As with all events, either real or simulated, something is learned.  This event was no different.  I will attempt to take them from the top.

 

The initial activation did not go smoothly because a standing procedure was not followed as expected.  D-24 leadership has already started discussing ways to streamline the process for a served agency to reach D-24 staff.

 

Text messaging proved to be a tool that needs further development.  Again, D-24 leadership has started the discussion on ways to utilize this tool and will be looking into ways to add it to our training and discussions with our general membership. 

 

Faced with a wide area repeater and phone outage, I later had to reflect what would have happened if we had received a real call out?  How would we have gotten in contact with our membership to respond?  I have no doubt that should a wide area phone outage occur and DCSO wants us, they would have sent a squad car to someone’s house to activate us.  OK, they got us, now how do we activate ourselves?  Again, this is a topic that needs to be discussed at the leadership level and a plan put into place to train the district’s members.

 

When we experienced another repeater failure during the SET, we moved operations to the portable repeater.  Although we had established backup operating frequencies should we experience a failure, the move was clumsy at best.  This was due to 1) lack of planning by the general membership, 2) members’ unfamiliarity with own equipment and 3) forgetting something (another way of saying planning).  All D-24 frequencies should be preprogrammed into all radios at all times.  We had some members forget what the CTCSS Tone and repeater offsets were.  We even had a MC (me) who forgot to apply a negative offset on his own radio and was trying to bring up the repeater in simplex mode.

 

This issue can be addressed by training and as a topic of discussion at our weekly nets.  Our monthly face-to-face meeting is a good place to test members to see if radios are ready and help those that need assistance.

 

One observation of the SET was that Q-signals were frequently used.   There is a need to stress to the general membership that this goes against our ICS training.  This can be address during our weekly nets as well as re-addressing this topic in our training sessions.

 

 

General Comments:  

 

All in all, this was a great event.  We stumbled yet we got back on our feet.  We identified areas where we can grow in our capabilities and found new ways to achieve our goals that will prove useful in the future.  We had fun and found out that Perry (W6AUN) and Tom (KØVKM) have too much fun.

 

Mikey Martin – KBØVJY

Mission Coordinator for SET 31 Oct 2006

ARES District 24 Logistics Officer