ARES Logo

ARESCO After-Action Report: SET Exercise

by Perry Lundquist, W6AUN, Emergency Coordinator, District 24, Douglas & Elbert Counties, 12-Oct-1998

  1. Date of activity
    • September 26, 1998

  2. Description of activity
    • Saturday, September 26, was D24's annual SET exercise. This year's SET was based upon a multi-agency Douglas County table top exercise that was held on the previous Thursday, and was based on a train derailment scenario. Douglas County is a prime area for train derailments with more than 30 trains operating through the county every day, carrying a multitude of products, many of which are hazardous. D24 took the county's table top exercise and gave it legs, making field assignments and carrying out communications activities. District 24 members successfully operated from the Douglas County Sheriff's dispatch center, a mock incident command post, two evacuation pickup points, two shelter locations, and a mock Red Cross branch. Distict 24 successfully established communications using the CRA's 147.225 repeater and packet radio.

  3. Duration of activity
    • 0800 to 1200

  4. Serving amateur radio groups participating
    • Colorado District 14

  5. Served agencies participating
    • Douglas County Office of Emergency Preparedness

  6. Describe served agency participation
    • Jim Raymond, Douglas County Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, observed our exercise

  7. Number of amateurs participating
    • 9

  8. List of amateurs participating

  9. Person-hours of amateur service
    • 36 hours

  10. Describe the Goals of the Activity
    • To activate our roster just like in a real emergency, make assignments and deploy to field locations, and successfully establish voice and packet radio communications.

  11. Did the Event Fulfill the Goals?
    • Yes, very well.

  12. What Went Well?
    • Members who participated in the exercise quickly set up their field operations and created a reliable communications system.

  13. Areas needing improvement
    • Member participation was low, even though the SET date and time were mentioned during weekly nets and in district e-mails, participation could possible have been improved by mailing a flyer to our members a week before the event. Part of the exercise tested participant skills in collecting information and passing complete messages. We could have done a better job at collecting details for requests made from shelters and other locations involved with the test.

  14. Lessons learned
    • Our members need to be completely familiar with their equipment and capabilities before they are asked to go to the field.

  15. Additional training needed
    • Message handling and information collecting. Packet equipment set up and operation.

  16. General comments
    • This year's SET was both successful and fun.

  17. Ideas for future exercises
    • [None provided.]